Error and/or relief
The abstract of judgment contains errors that must be corrected.
Holding:
The abstract of judgment does not reflect the additional custody credits [more than 2600 days or the fines ($300 restitution and parole revocation restitution) ordered by the court. Instead, the abstract of judgment incorrectly reflects a $5,000 restitution fine and a $5,000 parole revocation restitution fine. It also incorrectly reflects defendant’s total credits as [less than 750] days.
[Gary note: The court did not list any authorities in support of its order for the correction of the abstract of judgment, but there is plenty available had it seen the need. I set forth some below:]Authority:
People v. Mitchell (2001) 26 Cal.4th 181, 185
People v. Delgado (2008) 43 Cal.4th 1059, 1070
People v. Leon (2020) 8 Cal.5th 831, 855
In re Black (1967) 66 Cal.2d 881, 890
People v. Zackery (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 380, 385
People v. Farell (2002) 28 Cal.4th 381, 384, fn. 2