Error and/or relief
The abstract of judgment contains an incorrect date of the sentence and has incorrect numbers for the counts of conviction. It must be corrected.
Holding:
The trial court is directed to prepare a corrected abstract of judgment identifying the correct hearing dat, and in section 6.b., referencing counts 1, 2, and 6, rather than 1, 2, and 3.
(Gary note: The court listed no authority for its order to correct the abstract of judgment, so I have listed some cases below that the court could have cited.)
Authority:
People v. Mitchell (2001) 26 Cal.4th 181, 185
People v. Delgado (2008) 43 Cal.4th 1059, 1070
People v. Leon (2020) 8 Cal.5th 831, 855
In re Black (1967) 66 Cal.2d 881, 890
People v. Zackery (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 380, 385
People v. Farell (2002) 28 Cal.4th 381, 384, fn. 2