Error and/or relief
Following the defendant’s resentencing under section 1172.75, the amended abstracts of judgment fail to correctly capture the court’s calculation of custody credits and disposition of fines and fees. The clerk’s minutes reflect the same errors.
We will order the abstracts of judgment and minute order corrected to reflect the defendant’s [more than 10,000] additional days of actual credit and the trial court’s waiver of the restitution and parole revocation fees.
Holding:
Courts may correct clerical errors at any time, and appellate courts that have properly assumed jurisdiction of cases have ordered correction of abstracts of judgment that did not accurately reflect the oral judgments of sentencing courts.
Authority:
People v. Mitchell (2001) 26 Cal.4th 181, 185